PETER F. PAUL, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs.WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON,
Defendant, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
FOR
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE, INC.,
When I read this tidbit of foolishness I think of Rowan & Martin's Laugh - In skit with Sammy Davis Jr. "Here Come de' Judge"....
3 comments:
The case of Paul v Clinton has been hidden in plain sight by a media intent on protecting the Clintons from accountability for the felony violations of the election laws -captured on tape and in documents- that won them a Senate seat for Hillary.
The denial of the public's right to know that Peter Paul gave more than $1.2 million personally to Hillary's Senate campaign was the crime prosecuted against Hillary's finance director in 2005- according to the prosecutor in that case (see the transcript at www.paulvclinton.com) Yet Hillary has committed that crime continuously since 2001 when she has denied taking any money from Paul- after queried by the Washington Post- even in a 4th FEC report January, 2006-until today!
Honest people should tell other people who don't know about this case. Even if Hillary was VP, the Republicans would use this information to the max. According a Wall Street Journal articlw by John Emshwiller, on September 14, 2007, it shows poor character. You should read that article if the Wall Street J has not removed it from their archives. Only the bigots will hide behind the word bitter and Rev. Wright.
When you don't control media outlets and you can't greenlight what segments to do. How do you get this information out? This is why we need more media outlets that are not owned by big business.
Post a Comment